US State Department cables from places I have served plus items from my time as a UN peacekeeper. To increase public awareness of how diplomacy and peacekeeping are (were) actually done. All cables cleared by USG FOIA procedure. Cables are mostly those sent under my name from my posts but also others in which I was directly involved. UN documents and other items will also include occasional notes and background. Most recent in series on top with cables under the new series of UN documents.
Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts
Showing posts with label UN. Show all posts
Tuesday, May 16, 2017
Tuesday, March 7, 2017
99 Brasilia 02953: 54th UN General Assembly: U.S. Goals/Objectives: Brazilian Response*
*Note: Another UNGA related cable, see also: realdiplomacy.blogspot.com/2017/02/99-brasilia-02916-54th-unga-brazilian.html
Tuesday, February 28, 2017
99 Brasilia 02916: 54th UNGA: Brazilian Requests for Meetings and High-Level Attendance*
*Note: This was a yearly ritual of informing Washington of who would be in New York for the September opening session of the UN General Assembly and what meetings the foreign government officials might be requesting. This was to aid in scheduling.
Wednesday, June 29, 2016
99 Brasilia 2630: MINURCA: Proposed Expansion and Extension
Note: MINURCA was the United Nations Mission in the Central African Republic, and it was extended until 2000.
Friday, September 11, 2015
Monday, August 10, 2015
From my Journal for March 17 & 19: Dealing with Government treatment of darfur IDPs in Mayo Camp, Khartoum
March
17:
Shit is getting pretty near hitting the fan here. Spent the evening
hearing reports of police violence against Darfur displaced persons
at a camp near Khartoum. We made plans to be part of a dip convoy to
the camp first thing tomorrow morning. Then we hear that eight have
been killed and the violence is continuing. Tried to reach someone
in GOS to ask them to intercede. Nothing accomplished. Tomorrow, at
nine, off we go. The thugs are out of the closet and daring us not
to dance with them.
March
19:
Been an interesting 24 hours. Began yesterday with meeting a group
of Western diplomatic colleagues at the Dutch embassy. We
rendezvoused and set off for Mayo Camp to see if there was anything
we could do to help the Darfur refugees there. We heard that some
were being taken elsewhere and that the violence had continued
through the night. The government now admitted to three killed, two
women and a man. But we had reports that 15 had been killed and more
wounded. The government was clearly trying to get rid of the camp
before it attracted any more attention to the war in Darfur. We –
US, French, British, Dutch and others – wanted to get there before
they could do any more harm or erase the evidence. We failed. A
couple of miles or so from the camp, near a market on a road full of
traffic, we ran into a police roadblock, laid just for us. Not
waiting for the usual bullshit explanations, I jumped from the car
and started walking down the road. The police caught up to me. They
tried to tell me that I could not go on, that I did not have
permission. As the others caught up to me – I also had my
bodyguards – I explained that we did not need permission. I said I
would continue walking down the road. They said they could not allow
that. I said they would have to detain me to stop me and continued
walking. The police began to threaten and I paused to allow my
security to explain to them that they could not impede or touch a
diplomat. Things got heated. I made some calls to government people
who eventually told me that I had permission. I also took a picture
of the police block. This led to the police seeking to take my
camera away from me. I eventually agreed to erase the picture and
before being physically assaulted by a plainclothes policeman who was
threatening me – he was a thug – I gave the police a memory chip
that I had switched for the real one. A police general arrived with
a pickup full of plainclothes thugs. He explained that the police
were carrying out an “operation” at the camp and needed more time
to “clean up.” They could not allow us to go any further for our
own security. He assured me everything would be okay in a few hours
and we could return then. We then agreed to turn back. As we were
doing this, a UN team got a bit closer to the camp via another route
and smelled tear gas and saw people fleeing. Later, a team did reach
the camp but found it by that time deserted. Also latter, the
foreign minister passed a message saying he was angry with me for
trying to force the police to let us through. I rejected his
position and instead said that we were protesting our treatment by
the police.
Labels:
Bashir,
Darfur,
diplomacy,
France,
government,
human rights,
Khartoum,
Netherlands,
Sudan,
UK,
UN,
US
Monday, July 6, 2015
04 Khartoum 0252: Government and Darfur Rebels Accept Chad Plus Meeting
Also, see note below.
Note: The reference to an "external player" mentioned in para 2 was to political appointees from USAID. They were trying to prevent a Darfur negotiation from moving forward unless it was folded into the North-South peace process. These USAID officials were pro-SPLM and very much opposed to the Khartoum regime. They saw bringing the Darfur conflict into the wider negotiations with the government as a way to increase pressure on it and perhaps further dismember Sudan. These USAID appointees came from the Christian fundamentalist NGO community supportive of the SPLM as Christian black Africans vs Islamic Arabs. They originally sought to keep Darfur off our agenda because they saw it as a distraction to the "main show."
The following is from my journal entry for March 8. The "perfect storm" I was hoping to avoid was the reaction from USAID Washington to our joint EU/US effort to get Darfur talks going without bringing in extra issues.
Note: The reference to an "external player" mentioned in para 2 was to political appointees from USAID. They were trying to prevent a Darfur negotiation from moving forward unless it was folded into the North-South peace process. These USAID officials were pro-SPLM and very much opposed to the Khartoum regime. They saw bringing the Darfur conflict into the wider negotiations with the government as a way to increase pressure on it and perhaps further dismember Sudan. These USAID appointees came from the Christian fundamentalist NGO community supportive of the SPLM as Christian black Africans vs Islamic Arabs. They originally sought to keep Darfur off our agenda because they saw it as a distraction to the "main show."
The following is from my journal entry for March 8. The "perfect storm" I was hoping to avoid was the reaction from USAID Washington to our joint EU/US effort to get Darfur talks going without bringing in extra issues.
"I
think missed a weekend somewhere. I had 15 minutes of free time in
the office today and didn't know what to do with it. Started at 8:15
with the UK ambassador and wound up at 8pm after a two hour meeting
with a senior official. Along the way, spent another 1½ hours with
the French Ambassador. Got home to a dark house and microwaved one
of the dishes James left for me. Of course, at least I have a cook
and don't have to clean my own dishes.
I've
been doing a bunch of stuff – to avoid a “perfect storm” –
without DC reaction. Won't have any until tomorrow given time
difference. Another consequence of not having a weekend."
Friday, May 15, 2015
Journal Entry for February 18, 2004: Deep Inside Normal Khartoum "Diplomacy:
Ended the day at the British ambassador's residence, meeting
with him, the Dutch Charge and the UN Special Representative (a
Norwegian). I was sipping some fine scotch as we compared notes and
talked about serious Sudan stuff. It was approaching six and, as
usual, we had all probably had almost nothing to eat since breakfast.
Often don't have time to eat. We therefore made quick work of the
cashews and chips that had been provided with the drinks. The
Ambassador's wife offered her husband to refill the bowls. He,
understanding we'd make a meal of any choice snack foods he set out
in front of us, sensibly, if quietly, declined his wife's offer. We
kept drinking and talking but eventually I gave in and thought I'd
try one of the wrapped things in the bowl in the center of the small
table in front of us. Unwrapped it and since it looked soft, popped
it into my mouth. I immediately realized that it was not soft but,
in fact, hard as steel. It may never have been soft but clearly had
also been in that bowl for some time. Because it is what diplomats
do, I soldiered on as best I could. It was too big to discreetly get
rid of anywhere. I thought of letting it slip into my drink but
realized that could not pass unnoticed. I had no napkin. So I
downed some more scotch in the hope of dissolving it and eventually
ground it down to swallowing size. Needless to say, I did not
contribute much to the conversation during this period.
The
Ambassador noted my situation. An attentive host, he made a mental
note to get rid of the wrapped stuff at first opportunity. However,
the UN Special Representative did not notice. After my ordeal was
finally over and I could speak again, he reached for a wrapped thing.
The Ambassador, torn by a sense of responsibility and also
embarrassment, mumbled a warning about it being "hard candy"
but took no further action. The Norwegian popped it into his mouth
just as his phone rang. He got up and wandered into the hall to
talk. A few moments latter, I got up to leave. Said goodbyes and
went into the hall where I stuck out my hand to the Norwegian. By
the rules of diplomacy, he had no choice. He had to shake my hand
too. One of his hands was holding his phone so he stuck out the
other. In the middle of his palm was his discarded hard candy thing.
It was there in the middle as our hands clasped. Fortunately, he
was re-wrapped by this time. It's these moments that make this all
bearable.
Tuesday, March 24, 2015
Wednesday, February 18, 2015
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)